For example, this is a graph of yourmorals.org data and you’ll notice that conservatives are more likely to attribute their success at work and in relationships to effort (an internal-controllable trait) versus ability (internal, but not necessarily controllable) or context/luck (external). This attributional divide has been documented in other published research.
Source:www.polipsych.com
Note: a search at yourmorals.org resulted in no useful articles
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
46% vs. 42% – Good Connections Beat Hard Work
By a margin of 46-42, Americans say that the rich are rich mainly because they know the right people or are born into wealth rather than because of hard work, ambition or education. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the upper class is less likely to attribute their success to family ties or connections with 56% saying that rich people achieve their money through hard work. Most of the lower class (53%) believes that connections are the key. Read more
Source: pewresearch.org
Harvard University research shows that the most successful people in the world attribute 87.5 % of their success to their SOFT SKILLS and only 12.5 % of their success to their HARD SKILLS (Domain Skills (Engineering, Medicine, Science and all of other traditional education we spend decades in acquiring!)
Source: successskill.blogspot.com
Unable to locate the original study, not sure how credible the content is, but content is right on target
An investigation into the differential profile of predictors of objective and subjective career success
Document Information: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Title: |
An investigation into the differential profile of predictors of objective and subjective career success |
||||||||||||||||||
Author(s): |
Ghulam R. Nabi, (School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK) |
||||||||||||||||||
Citation: |
Ghulam |
||||||||||||||||||
Keywords: |
Career development, Higher education, Salaries, United Kingdom |
||||||||||||||||||
Article type: |
Research paper |
||||||||||||||||||
DOI: |
10.1108/13620439910270599 (Permanent URL) |
||||||||||||||||||
Publisher: |
MCB UP Ltd |
||||||||||||||||||
Abstract: |
This research examined the different profile of individual, opportunity structure, and career strategy variables related to both objective (salary) and subjective (self-perceived) career success. Questionnaire data were obtained from a stratified sample of 723 full-time employees at several higher education institutions in the north of England. Controlling for age, tenure, gender, and occupation, a different profile of factors predicted objective and subjective career success. The highest objective career success was reported by employees with a high level of education, who worked in larger organizations with well-structured progression ladders and invested considerable effort in their work role. In contrast, the highest subjective career success was reported by employees who were high on work centrality, who worked in organizations with well-structured progression ladders and employment security, and who networked frequently yet reported a lack of ambition. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed, together with avenues for further research. Source: www.emeraldinsight.com Fig Source: www.emeraldinsight.com
Fig Source:
Fig source: www.emeraldinsight.com
Fig source: www.emeraldinsight.com
Situational characteristics and subjective career success: The mediating role of career-enhancing strategies
Fig Source:
|
Towards developing a theoretical framework for measuring public sector managers’ career success
Document Information: |
|
Title: |
Towards developing a theoretical framework for measuring public sector managers’ career success |
Author(s): |
Roziah Mohd Rasdi, |
Citation: |
Roziah Mohd Rasdi, Maimunah Ismail, Jegak Uli, Sidek Mohd Noah, |
Keywords: |
Career development, Careers, Malaysia, Managers, Public sector organizations |
Article type: |
Literature review |
DOI: |
10.1108/03090590910950596 (Permanent URL) |
Publisher: |
Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
Abstract: |
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework for measuring public sector managers’ career success. Design/methodology/approach – Findings – Research limitations/implications – Practical implications – Originality/value – |
Source: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Fig Source: http://t0.gstatic.com
An Empirical Investigation of the Predictors of Executive Career Success
Timothy A. Judge, Daniel M. Cable, John W. Boudreau, Robert D. Bretz Jr. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu
Self- and Other-Referent Criteria of Career Success
Journal of Career Assessment August 200311: 262-286
http://pheslin.cox.smu.edu