As we approach the celebration of Veterans Day in the United States and Remembrance Day in Canada on Tuesday, November 11, we thought it might be a good time to look at the way our veterans are treated.
Here at the DO we often disagree with the various military adventures into which politicians enmesh us. But as our readers frequently remind us, the job of the armed forces is to obey orders, not to make policy.
Like most of our generation, we’ve been fortunate enough to avoid military conscription. Father Outrage served in the army during the Korean Conflict, and Grandfather Outrage managed to fight in both WWI and WWII. George Washington once said, “I am a soldier, so that my son can be a farmer, so that his son can be a poet.” Well, the DO hardly qualifies as poetry, but we hope Grandfather Outrage is not too disappointed.
Our hats our off to all the men and women who have fought our country’s battles. Even when foolish politicians have sent you off to foreign jungles and deserts you’ve fought bravely, often displaying amazing valor and resourcefulness. While politicians have taken the credit, or tried to avoid the blame, the armed forces have shed real blood around the globe.
So how has America rewarded those who have fought our country’s battles? We thought we might compare the way that society rewards those who fight and die for their country with the way the court system compensates “victims.” Here goes:
“If the veteran, as the result of service-connected disability, has suffered the anatomical loss or loss of use of one or more creative organs, or one foot, or one hand, or both buttocks, or blindness of one eye, having only light perception, or has suffered complete organic aphonia with constant inability to communicate by speech, or deafness of both ears, having absence of air and bone conduction, the rate of compensation therefor shall be $70 per month for each such loss but in no event to exceed $3,093 per month.” –United States Code, Title 38, Section 1110(k)
To translate from the legalese, if a soldier stepped on a mine and had his foot blown off, being maimed for life, he would receive $70 per month. If he lost one hand, one foot, one ear, complete loss of hearing, and both his buttocks were blown away he would receive an amount “in no event to exceed $3,093 per month.”
On the other hand, if they were a navy aviator like Paula Coughlin and they were “harassed” as part of the Tailhook scandal, then their compensation would be $5 million. Coughlin was not physically injured, but suffered “psychological trauma.” (This award was upheld by an appeals court jury.)
“If the veteran, as the result of service-connected disability, has suffered the anatomical loss or loss of use of both feet, or of one hand and one foot, or is blind in both eyes, with 5/200 visual acuity or less, or is permanently bedridden or so helpless as to be in need of regular aid and attendance, the monthly compensation shall be $2,207.” –United States Code, Title 38, Section 1110(l)
On the other hand, Alonzo Jackson was awarded $850,000 when an Eddie Bauer security guard forced him to remove a shirt the guard thought was stolen. Jackson cried on the stand when he reenacted the trauma of removing his shirt for the jury. Two friends of the crying boy (who were forced to stand in a corner) were each awarded $75,000.
“If the veteran, as the result of service-connected disability, has suffered the anatomical loss or loss of use of both arms at levels, or with complications, preventing natural elbow action with prostheses in place, has suffered the anatomical loss of both legs so near the hip as to prevent the use of prosthetic appliances, or has suffered the anatomical loss of one arm and one leg so near the shoulder and hip as to prevent the use of prosthetic appliances, or has suffered the anatomical loss of both eyes, or has suffered blindness without light perception in both eyes, the monthly compensation shall be $2,768.” –United States Code, Title 38, Section 1110(n)
Like Alonzo Jackson, four female employees at a Hardee’s were also forced to remove some clothing by their female supervisors as part of a search for stolen money. The four women were awarded $901,900.
What about a soldier who makes the ultimate sacrifice for his country, and dies in battle? How is his family compensated for the loss? Depending on the soldier’s rank, his grieving family may receive anywhere from $769 per month to $1,636 per month.
On the other hand, the parents of Sergio Jiminez were awarded $262,500,000 as a result of the death of their six-year-old. Mr. and Mrs. Jiminez did not put their child in a seat belt, and they may have run a red light leading to the accident. The South Carolina jury thought that Chrysler did not adequately design a latch on the Jimenez’s minivan.
To summarize, if veterans serving their country:
- Lose a hand or foot they get $70 per month.
- Go blind or lose both feet or both hands: $2,207 per month.
- Lose both legs: 2,768 per month.
- Die: Maximum of $1,636 per month for surviving family.
On the other hand, if you’re a woman or minority and you can get “victim status” the awards are dramatically different:
- If you’re a female officer harassed by your fellow officers: $5,000,000.
- If you’re black and you cry because you had to take off your shirt in public: $850,000.
- If you’re a woman and had to take off your shirt in private: $225,475.
- If you’re Hispanic, don’t put your child in a seat belt, run a red light, and the child dies: $262,500,000.
Is this the America our parents and grandparents died to defend?
READ MORE ABOUT IT
Read more about disability benefits for veterans.
Read more about benefits for veterans’ survivors.
No matter how hard some may try, there are no justifiable wars. This does not mean that one shouldn’t defend his family, community & country when attacted by an inside or outside enemy. During this period of war, there are no inocents as if they want the bombs to stop then convince their government to stop. It is a travesty that a military person injured or killed defending his country is so badly compensated. However, this comes out of the tax till & is one place that politicians can cut without much bellyaching. This American society is sue crazy and the “Big Pocket” payers are the ones that pay even if it is from taxes. When none citizens receive payment for their own foolish actions, it is wrong and this type of litigation should be curtailed. But when lawyers are a majority of the legislators then we have laws on the books so they can make a living when not in office. It is plain that lawyers receive their fees whether they win or lose a case. This has bred a society that think they have a right to become wealthy without working for it. We have too many groups that are out to screw all non-members of their group just they have political clout.
Time: 6/11/98 (0:10:5)
Time: 12/22/97 (16:42:45)
Time: 12/22/97 (10:20:24)
Time: 11/11/97 (23:8:47)
Time: 11/11/97 (16:13:8)
Time: 11/11/97 (14:36:19)
Time: 11/11/97 (11:52:23)
Time: 11/11/97 (10:6:2)
Time: 11/11/97 (7:24:29)
Time: 11/11/97 (6:44:34)
Time: 11/10/97 (22:50:37)
Time: 11/10/97 (21:35:2)
Time: 11/10/97 (21:10:23)
Time: 11/10/97 (19:42:9)
Time: 11/10/97 (16:25:14)
Time: 11/10/97 (16:1:22)
Time: 11/10/97 (15:53:49)
Time: 11/10/97 (15:3:19)
Time: 11/10/97 (14:28:21)
Time: 11/10/97 (13:13:41)
Time: 11/10/97 (12:19:40)
Time: 11/10/97 (11:49:43)
Time: 11/10/97 (9:56:9)
Gordon Lightfoot put it best in his song, “Don Quixote”:
“See the soldier with his gun who mus be dead to be admired.” The day will come when politicians will be groveling at the feet of veternans begging us to save America from the very enemies who were given arms and technology by these same sellout politicians.
Hopefully, the arguement in this outrage is that victims are
receiving too much for what they believe is making them
victims. If that’s the case, the good job. American
Society has become so dominated by victims that we
appear ridiculous. Maybe, out society has become that
because of the sheer number of lawyers.
I think it’s quite sad that the family of soldier who dies
serving his country is compensated less than a kid’s
family is compensated when this family did not put
the child in his or her seatbelt. The soldier knows that his
family will not be well compensated when he enlists, but
that doesn’t justify the absurd amount awarded to that
family.
I suggest you send this outrage to every judge and
politician in the country.
One suggestion, the article could easily be construed as
racist. White people (I am white) believe themselves to
be the victims as often as anybody else. The McDonalds
coffee case is more than enough proof for that.
Thank you for pointing out once again how the person who chooses the proper path gets screwed in the new “America”.
Semper Fi
To the editor,
Allthough I have never served in the armed forces, I find it outrageous how the people in this country, (Especialy the people of my generation)take the freedoms they have been given for granted. In fact most people do not understand how precious this freedom is. Moreover they do not understand the sacrifices that soldiers have given, and are giving today to assure that freedom. Having a morning latte in our $200,000 homes and driving a $40,000 SUV to work while we complain the whole time about our government seems to be a favorite pastime.
Most of the people I know are liberal and do not even know what that means. They do not understand that our basic way of life has been protected for hundreds of years by brave men who where willing to give their lives to protect ou freedoms.
I think that the men of my generation have been “feminized”, materialized, and made oblivious to the fact that our freedom is fragile.The only thing between our freedom and standing in line for bread is our military.
I have a lot more to say to the Al Gore voting liberals in this country, however it might get offensive. I will leave you with this:
THANK YOU!
To anyone how has the courage to defend this nation.