fbpx

SAINT RALPH AND THE EVIL GIANT!

Consumer advocates are those angels of protection that save you from the ravages of rapacious capitalists. The latter, as everyone well knows, are constantly using their    clever, but twisted, minds in thinking up new ways of duping gullible consumers into paying outrageously high prices for defective products.

The archangel of consumer advocates is of course Saint Ralph, who was anointed either by God or Harvard Law School to protect us all. Saint Ralph and his brethren expose shoddy manufacturers who sell us dangerous goods at inflated prices.

Consumer advocates, of course, abhor the idea of profit. (Somehow Ralph and his trusty band seem to clothe and feed themselves, but only for the good of others.)

Sometimes one would think that Nader and his fellow advocates wanted businesses to give away their products!

Lo and behold! Nader and his allies have actually stumbled upon a medium where producers do give away their products! It’s called the Internet, and it is rife with thousands of products, like The Outrage, available for free.

In addition to gobs of free content, one can even get many of the tools, such as Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser, for free. A consumer advocate’s promised land!

But Heaven is not what it seems. It’s so easy for gullible journalists and consumers to confuse Heaven and Hell.

Saint Ralph has decided that the price for Microsoft’s browser is outrageous. His group, the Consumer Project On Technology, is petitioning the government to force Microsoft to charge consumers to use their browser. James Love, the director of the project, says “We’re asking the government to require that Microsoft raise the cost of the browser.”

This may be a little confusing for the uninitiated, so we’ll recap. Consumer groups spend most of their time trying to convince the government that producers are making unconscionable profits and ripping-off consumers. These groups often lobby the government to force prices down. Now Rader’s group is petitioning the government to force Microsoft to raise the price of their browser.

What’s up? Nader’s group, and many other foes of the evil giant, can see what you and I can’t. Microsoft plans to run all of its competitors out of business, and then Lord Bill will rule the world!

How did the Consumer Project on Technology come to this conclusion? First of all, you need to understand that as the Green Party presidential candidate in 1996 Nader demonstrated that industrialization has ruined the planet. So Nader clearly understands technology.

The man that has openly expressed his admiration for Chairman Mao and the Cultural Revolution also has a keen grasp of the way markets work. Nader understands that it’s impossible that consumers are the true beneficiary of the browser wars between the evil giant and their competitor Netscape.

Nader also knows that the evil giant has never made a mistake, and will never end up losing money on the whole strategy behind the browser give-away. Saint Ralph understands that capitalist overlords like Bill Gates, though evil, are omnipotent and omniscient.

Who are the damsels-in-distress whom Nader seeks to rescue from the clutches of master oppressor Gates? The company is called Netscape Communications, and has 1,200 employees. What is the strategy that established Netscape’s browser as the leader in the market? Why, they gave away millions of their browsers until they had a dominant market share!

The owners of Netscape are clearly a group in need of government protection. The Outrage estimates that Netscape chairman James Clark share of the company is currently worth $579 million. President James Barksdale’s slice is now worth about $187 million.

What is a “fair” price for the Internet Explorer? Not too little and not too much? Only Saint Ralph knows.

  • Save this Post to Scrapbook

0 thoughts on “SAINT RALPH AND THE EVIL GIANT!

  1. I was almost horrified when I discovered myself to be in agreement with Nader (w/respect to MicroSloth)!
    As to his previous activities, his various “attacks” have usually been political power plays (the Corvair was much safer [even the pre-1965] than the VW; Dioxin, ALAR, were attacks that were not based upon scientific data).
    PCP was (and IS) the safest dielectric coolant for power transformers and is safer for the public and industry workers than anything in current use (see IEEE papers).
    Plutonium is NOT “the most dangerous substance known to man (sic)”. Hazardous, yes but a far cry from a great many other substances!

    I believe that it is precisely the likes of Saint Ralph that have led us down a road from which this nation may not recover. The cost of _everything_ is inflated (often by orders of magnitude) to pay the costs of unnecessary regulation and tort libility!

    Time: 10/21/97 (23:22:29)

    Who is Irving Kristol?

    Time: 10/21/97 (10:56:8)

    IE is not really free, either. Its cost is included in the price of Windows, which MS would have you upgrade for big bucks. Note also that the cost of Windows upgrade is deceptive, since most consumers will also need to upgrade their hardware and other apps to take advantage of the uppgrade.

    And indeed, IE is free only to dislodge Netscape, without which company MS would not be in the Internet business at all, but would still be pushing their proprietary and more expensive solutions on us all. If it was a Japanese comnpany, we would have
    long embargoed them for dumping and unfair trade practices.

    Lastly, let off on Ralph Nader. Do not forget that consumer products in the US are relatively safe largely due to the crusades launched by him. In my book, he does qualify as a Saint, no sarcasm intended.

    Time: 10/16/97 (18:46:48)

    lord nader may not know but most of us surfers if we crash will call uncle bill and pay the $35 to get back up.

    Oh and is a world run by some one with and I.Q. a bad thing I seem to think we could use a few more people like uncle bill in congress.

    Time: 10/16/97 (13:15:3)

    Now they (Nader) want you to spend money,how else can he figure out how to get into every one’s pocket

    Time: 10/16/97 (12:17:13)

    In order to appease Mr. Nader’s concerns, I think that Microsoft should announce a price increase of at least 4 times the current cost of their IE browser.

    Let’s see now if I multiply $0.00 x 4 my final cost as a fair consumer would be ?

    Hmm, I guess I can manage that cost quite easily without breaking my computing budget.

    Time: 10/16/97 (11:54:19)

    I’m outraged that only in the land of the free are corporations punished for being too successful, and incompetantly run organizations (the White House included) are paraded as poor innocents overwhelmed by the big, bad well-run, well-managed opposition.

    Time: 10/16/97 (10:44:11)

    The problem is not that MSIE is free, but that it is being used as a device for controlling the future and format of the Internet! MSIE 4.0 contains all sorts of goodies which only MICROSOFT can put in because it requires an “operating system update”, something only Microsoft can provide. Could Netscape do what Microsoft did with its browser? No way, since they are not at liberty to change the system libraries!

    Time: 10/16/97 (10:3:39)

    Let’s not be too hard on Ralph Nader. Maybe he is sticking his nose where it doesn’t belong with regard to MS but that doesn’t make his past accomplishments less significant.

    I have always admired him for what he did to improve automobile safety.

    I love the cynical humor you guys express at DO. Keep it up!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *